In my previous article on Critical care or Intensive care(The link betweek efficiency and patient safety), we saw how efficiency can impact patient safety and thereby the outcome. Now let us examine a recent innovation in the area of critical care that has actually accomplished this at the John’s Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore,MD.
The Problem
Poor and inconsistent communication among providers in the intensive care unit (ICU) can lead to a lack of understanding of daily goals and the failure to deliver needed services that accelerate recovery and discharge.
ICU patients tend to have life-threatening problems and complex care needs that require a combination of many treatments and services in order to achieve timely recovery and discharge.
Lack of communication among providers can lead to a lack of understanding about what needs to occur each day in the ICU.
The net result is that patients remain in the ICU longer than necessary, and are at greater risk of harm, including morbidities and mortality.
The Solution
The ICU care team (which includes the attending physician and/or fellow, anesthesia and surgery residents, a nurse practitioner, a nurse, and a pharmacist) visits each ICU patient every day between 20 and 25 minutes and uses the ICU Daily Goals Form to document the This creates a standardized way to communicate with one another and a focussed plan of care.
Expected Benefits
- The benefit of this innovation may be greatest with high-intensity patients, such as those in the ICU. It also may be most applicable in academic medical centers and other organizations where ICU care is provided by many different types of practitioners.
- Reduced LOS – At Johns Hopkins where this innovation was pioneered, the mean length of stay in the ICU reduced from 2.2 days to 1.1 days
Over a year approximately five million people recieve Intensive care in the United States. In hospitals we refer refer to these patients as ‘critical care’. While the ICU in most hospitals is perhaps the most well run unit from a patient safety standpoint. There is still room for improvement from an efficiency standpoint. And if we increase efficiency we can greatly affect clinical outcomes and paitent safety.
Now wait a minute, how is that possible. Isn’t efficiency about financial dollars for the hospital and something about working like Toyota or GE. What has it got to do with patient care, safety and clinical outcomes ? Ok, let us look at some facts and you can decide for yourself.
Facts from America’s ICUs
- The average length of stay in an ICU unit is 4 days
- Average number of Critical care/ICU patients per day is 90,000
- The average survival rate is 86%
You might say 86% is not bad, and infact its a good outcome in most clinical areas. But consider these facts,
- Infections are the main cause for fatality in critical care
- 4% of all patients contract line infections after 10 days
- After 10 days with a catheter 4% of patients (in the US) develop bladder infections
- After 10 days on a ventilator 6% develop penumonia and 40-50% of cases result in death
In other words, as length of stay increases (which is an important efficiency metric) the chances of survival reduce greatly. Ok now, let us consider the costs.
- On average ICU patients occupy 10% of total beds in the US
- On average ICU beds account for 30% of an acute care hospital cost in the US
- The total cost of critical care is $180 billion in the US
I hope I have made a case for improvements in the ICU.
(*Stats Ref: Dr. Atul Gawande’s article in the New Yorker and the Society for Critical Care Medicine)
Filed under:
Critical Care